Opinion
3:23-cv-226
10-16-2023
Stephanie K. Bowman Magistrate Judge
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 5); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. No. 4); AND (3) DISMISSING ANY PART OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS THAT SEEK IMMEDIATE OR SPEEDIER RELEASE FROM STATE CUSTODY OR MAY DIRECTLY CHALLENGE THE RESULTS OF PLAINTIFF'S POST-RELEASE CONTROL VIOLATION HEARING(S)
Michael J. Newman United States District Judge
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. No. 5), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 5) in its entirety; (2) DENIES Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief without prejudice (Doc. No. 4); and (3) DISMISSES any part of Plaintiff's claims that seek immediate or speedier release from state custody or may directly challenge the results of Plaintiff's post-release control violation hearing(s).
IT IS SO ORDERED.