From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffmann and Roth v. Stoll

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 19, 1988
748 P.2d 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

8611-07067; CA A44238

Argued and submitted December 16, 1987,

Affirmed January 13, 1987 Reconsideration denied March 25, 1987 Petition for review allowed April 19, 1988

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Clifford B. Olsen, Judge.

Stuart K. Cohen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy E. Brophy and Bernard, Kneeland, Crawford Brophy, Portland.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Delbert Stoll. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang Smith, Portland.

Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Richard W. Hagadorn. With him on the brief was Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley Lagesen, Portland.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or. App. 340, 717 P.2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or. 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.


I dissent for the reasons stated by Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or. App. 340, 348, 717 P.2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or. 155 (1986).


Summaries of

Hoffmann and Roth v. Stoll

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 19, 1988
748 P.2d 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Hoffmann and Roth v. Stoll

Case Details

Full title:HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 19, 1988

Citations

748 P.2d 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
748 P.2d 180

Citing Cases

Hoffmann v. Stoll

On review from the Court of Appeals. On appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Honorable Clifford B.…

Heusser v. Jackson County Health Dept

Plaintiff does not plead facts that would allow her to recover her alleged damages under any negligence…