Hoffman v. Rockey

1 Citing case

  1. Doe v. American Red Cross

    322 Or. 502 (Or. 1996)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that, without any evidence as to what Doe would have discovered if he had inquired, defendant was not entitled to summary judgment on its statute of limitations defense

    " (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.) In the trial court, plaintiff relied on the formulation of those elements found in Hoffman v. Rockey, 55 Or. App. 658, 639 P.2d 1284 (1982). The third prong of the test in that case was described as "the act of the alleged tortfeasor was negligent."