From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. City of N.Y.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2014-02368

03-23-2016

Sandra Hoffman, appellant, v. City of New York, et al., respondents.

The Law Firm of Ravi Batra, P.C., New York, NY (Todd B. Sherman of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Francis F. Caputo and Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondents.


SANDRA L. SGROI JEFFREY A. COHEN BETSY BARROS, JJ. (Index No. 9380/09)

The Law Firm of Ravi Batra, P.C., New York, NY (Todd B. Sherman of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Francis F. Caputo and Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ash, J.), dated December 17, 2013, which granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when a vehicle in which she was a passenger collided at an intersection with a van that was owned by the City of New York Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and operated by its employee, Kenneth Bell. The plaintiff commenced this action against Bell and the City of New York (hereinafter together the defendants) to recover damages for injuries she sustained in the accident. The defendants moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the motion. The plaintiff appeals.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see Vega v Mitja, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2014-02352; decided herewith]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

BALKIN, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Hoffman v. City of N.Y.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Hoffman v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Sandra Hoffman, appellant, v. City of New York, et al., respondents.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2053
26 N.Y.S.3d 880

Citing Cases

Yahney v. Stern

In opposition, defendants have failed to submit any evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a…