From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hofeling v. Hofeling

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 2, 1989
546 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-01441.

August 2, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John S. Andrews, Judge.

Thomas D. Koch, Clearwater, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


We reverse the trial court's order adjudicating appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt. The proceedings leading to the entry of the order were not conducted in conformity with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 in the following respects: (1) the order to show cause lacked proper predicates, see Paris v. Paris, 427 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Deter v. Deter, 353 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); (2) defendant, being absent from the contempt hearing, was not afforded rights given by rule 3.840(a)(4) and (a)(7), see Bradley v. State, 420 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and (3) the order from which this appeal has been taken does not recite the facts constituting the contempt as required by rule 3.840(a)(7), see White v. Buck, 505 So.2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.


Summaries of

Hofeling v. Hofeling

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 2, 1989
546 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Hofeling v. Hofeling

Case Details

Full title:BLAINE THOMAS HOFELING, APPELLANT, v. LAURA CATHERINE HOFELING…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 2, 1989

Citations

546 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Miller

In this petition for writ of habeas corpus, Rodriguez seeks review of an order which found him in indirect…

In re Luskin

The trial court held the wife in contempt of court when she failed to appear. This court ruled that the…