From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodgson v. Frisch Dixie, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 24, 1972
469 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1155.

October 24, 1972.

Irwin G. Waterman, Allan Weiss, Louisville, Ky., on brief for defendants-appellants; Morris, Garlove, Waterman Johnson, Louisville, Ky., of counsel.

Richard F. Schubert, Sol. of Labor, Carin Ann Clauss, Associate Sol., Donald S. Shire and James D. Henry, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Marvin M. Tincher, Regional Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

Before WEICK, EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.


Defendant appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division, restraining appellants from withholding payment of certain minimum wages found by the court to be due their employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201-219 (1970).

The District Court entered extensive findings of fact pertaining to the violations of said Act, which findings of fact on review of this record we certainly cannot hold to be clearly erroneous. This record is replete with evidence which supports the District Judge's findings.

Appellants also contend that the District Judge's order requiring payment of approximately $8,000 to the Secretary of Labor for distribution to the employees concerned was unauthorized by § 17 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 217 (1970). On review of the language of the Act and its legislative history, we hold that this order is consistent with both the letter of the Act and the congressional intention involved in its adoption. Hodgson v. Wheaton Glass Co., 446 F.2d 527, 529-534 (3d Cir. 1971); Shultz v. Mistletoe Express Service, Inc., 434 F.2d 1267 (10th Cir. 1971).

Further, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the District Judge in his rulings on the admission of evidence or in the modification of his pretrial order.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hodgson v. Frisch Dixie, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 24, 1972
469 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Hodgson v. Frisch Dixie, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. HODGSON, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 1972

Citations

469 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Herman v. Collis Foods

See id. at 1371. In particular, it distinguished Hodgson v. Frisch Dixie, Inc., 20 Wage Hour Cas. (BNA) 167,…

Marshall v. Presidio Valley Farms, Inc.

The Secretary of Labor shall deliver the sums owed them to those employees identified either through their…