From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hochberg v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 5, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. 1984)

Summary

holding that a court cannot grant an extension to file a late notice of claim after the expiration of the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Bordeau v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Opinion

Decided July 5, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Anthony J. Mercorella, J.

Edward P. Dunphy for appellants.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Margaret G. King of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 99 A.D.2d 1028).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Hochberg v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 5, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. 1984)

holding that a court cannot grant an extension to file a late notice of claim after the expiration of the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Bordeau v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Case details for

Hochberg v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALAN HOCHBERG et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 5, 1984

Citations

63 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. 1984)
479 N.Y.S.2d 524
468 N.E.2d 706

Citing Cases

Vandermast v. New York City Transit Authority

It is well-settled that the Court is without jurisdiction to permit the plaintiff to comply with the Notice…

Wollins v. New York City Bd. of Educ

it of General Municipal Law § 50-i(1)(c), their untimely notice of claim, served without seeking leave of the…