From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoch v. Mayberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-02258-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-02258-DLB PC

02-21-2013

CORY HOCH, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


ECF Nos. 34, 36


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

Plaintiff Cory Hoch ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 7, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff either to file a second amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable. ECF No. 34. Plaintiff was provided thirty days by which to comply. ECF No. 34. On November 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time. ECF No. 35. On January 3, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff up to January 22, 2013 by which to file a response. ECF No. 36. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hoch v. Mayberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-02258-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hoch v. Mayberg

Case Details

Full title:CORY HOCH, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-02258-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)