From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoboken v. Babbitt

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 266 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 1925 —

Decided March 16, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 2 N.J. Mis. R. 505.

For the appellant, John J. Fallon and Horace L. Allen.

For the respondents, Pierson Schroeder and Hopkins Herr.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hoboken v. Babbitt

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 266 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Hoboken v. Babbitt

Case Details

Full title:MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, APPELLANT, v. REBECCA BABBITT ET…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1925

Citations

128 A. 266 (N.J. 1925)
128 A. 266

Citing Cases

Whelan v. the Borough of Chatham

I can find but one authority for the proposition that sidewalks may be constructed as a local improvement.…

Johnston v. Ellis

It appears from the record that appellant admitted the correctness of the several items of these tabulations.…