From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-115 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-115

11-12-2013

HOBART CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS BRADFORD SOAP INTERNATIONAL, INC., CINTAS CORPORATION, AND HEWITT SOAP WORKS, INC. (DOC. #102)

On June 10, 2013, Defendants Bradford Soap International, Inc. ("Bradford Soap"), Cintas Corporation ("Cintas"), and Hewitt Soap Works, Inc. ("Hewitt") filed a Motion to Dismiss. Doc. #102. Subsequently, on July 26, 2013, the Court sustained Plaintiffs' Motion to Drop Bradford Soap and Cintas Without Prejudice. See Doc. #133; 7/26/13 Notation Order. Thereafter, on August 26, 2013, Hewitt filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Doc. #153, re-asserting the same arguments that had previously been raised. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES AS MOOT the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Bradford Soap International, Inc., Cintas Corporation, and Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., Doc. #102.

____________________________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-115 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.

Case Details

Full title:HOBART CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-115 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)