Opinion
September, 1929.
Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
HOAG v. BROCKWAY COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Summaries of
HOAG v. BROCKWAY COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for
HOAG v. BROCKWAY COMPANY
Case Details
Full title:DAVID A. HOAG, Respondent, v. THE BROCKWAY COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Sep 1, 1929
Citations
227 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)