From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ho v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1902
118 F. 1017 (9th Cir. 1902)

Opinion


118 F. 1017 (9th Cir. 1902) JEUNG JUEN HO v. UNITED STATES. No. 755. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 6, 1902

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

Samuel M. Shortridge, Louis P. Boardman, and Denson & Schlesinger, for plaintiff in error.

Marshall B. Woodworth, U.S. Atty.

Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are stronger for the government than were those in the cases of Jeung Lin Heung v. U.S. (No. 764) 116 F. 1020, and Lee Ah Yin v. U.S. (No. 756) 116 F. 614, disposed of at the last term of the court. What was then said by this court, applied to the record in the present case, necessitates an affirmance of the judgment appealed from. The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ho v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1902
118 F. 1017 (9th Cir. 1902)
Case details for

Ho v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JEUNG JUEN HO v. UNITED STATES.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 1902

Citations

118 F. 1017 (9th Cir. 1902)

Citing Cases

In re Parkway Knittng Mills

There has been a conflict in decisions in the past as appears by the cases cited on behalf of the petitioner.…