From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ho v. Pinsukanjana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 29, 2018
Case No. 17-cv-06520-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-cv-06520-PJH

05-29-2018

RITA C HO, Plaintiff, v. MARK PINSUKANJANA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 14, 34, 51

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins' Report and Recommendation Re: Motion to Strike and Temporary Asset Restraining Order. Having received no objections to the report, and finding the report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, the court adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff's motion to strike, supplemental motion to strike, and motion for a temporary asset restraining order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 29, 2018

/s/_________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ho v. Pinsukanjana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 29, 2018
Case No. 17-cv-06520-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Ho v. Pinsukanjana

Case Details

Full title:RITA C HO, Plaintiff, v. MARK PINSUKANJANA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 29, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-cv-06520-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2018)