From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ho v. May Ku

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 19, 2022
CV 21-8496-DMG (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-8496-DMG (JEMx)

01-19-2022

John Ho v. May Ku


Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

On December 13, 2021, the Court issued an Order setting a Scheduling Conference in this case [Doc. # 13]. That Order required the parties to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and warned that "[t]he failure to submit a joint report in advance of the Scheduling Conference . . . may result in the dismissal of the action, striking the answer and entering a default, and/or the imposition of sanctions." Id. at 4.

On January 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed a unilateral Rule 26(f) report. Defendant is ordered to show cause, in a written response filed by no later than January 25, 2022, why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to cooperate in the filing of the joint report. Failure to timely file a written response to this Order will result in the striking of Defendant's Answer and entry of default. The filing of a proper Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the above deadline will be deemed an adequate response.

The January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference is VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ho v. May Ku

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 19, 2022
CV 21-8496-DMG (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Ho v. May Ku

Case Details

Full title:John Ho v. May Ku

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 19, 2022

Citations

CV 21-8496-DMG (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2022)