From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 29, 2000.

December 19, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated February 28, 2000, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510(3) to change the venue of the action from the Supreme Court, Kings County, to the Supreme Court, Queens County.

Ptashnik Schutzman, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Neil Ptashnik of counsel), for appellants.

Richard P. Neimark Associates, LLP, New City, N.Y. (Carol R. Finocchio and Marie R. Hodukavich of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion to change the venue of the action pursuant to CPLR 510(3) (see, Miszko v. Leeds Morelli, 269 A.D.2d 372; Schlegel v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 258 A.D.2d 576; Mallory v. Long Is. R. R., 245 A.D.2d 493).


Summaries of

H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing

Case Details

Full title:H.M.K., ETC., RESPONDENT, v. MARGARET TIETZ CENTER FOR NURSING CARE, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 611