From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hirsch v. Syrota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 1998
253 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 31, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to strike the defendants' demand for a trial by jury. We agree with the trial court that the defendants are entitled to a jury trial ( see, CPLR 4101; Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft v. Spinale, 177 A.D.2d 315, 316). In reaching this determination, we have not considered the plaintiff's arguments concerning waiver, which were improperly raised for the first time in his reply papers on the motion to strike the defendants' demand for a trial by jury ( see,. Fischer v. Weiland, 241 A.D.2d 439).

O'Brien, J.P., Sullivan, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hirsch v. Syrota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 1998
253 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hirsch v. Syrota

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP HIRSCH, Appellant, v. JANET SYROTA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 31, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

Tobias v. Manginelli

We have not considered the third-party defendants' contention that the action against them is barred by a…

Parratta v. McAllister

Therefore, the motion was properly denied. We have not considered the affidavit which was improperly…