From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinson v. McQueen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 16, 1991
581 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1034.

July 16, 1991.

Edward James Hinson, in pro. per.

James D. McQueen, in pro. per.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


Mandamus denied.

NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ., concur.


I concur in the majority's denial without prejudice of the petition for writ of mandamus. The petitioner may seek appropriate relief in the circuit court. Snowden v. Davis, 581 So.2d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).


Summaries of

Hinson v. McQueen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 16, 1991
581 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hinson v. McQueen

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JAMES HINSON, PETITIONER, v. JAMES D. McQUEEN, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 16, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)