From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinson v. Marlin E. Fitch, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 2, 1968
212 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37283.

July 2, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Edward Schroll, Miami, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Beisler, Ft. Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner's application for attorney's fees is also denied.

CALDWELL, C.J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hinson v. Marlin E. Fitch, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 2, 1968
212 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Hinson v. Marlin E. Fitch, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER L. HINSON, PETITIONER, v. MARLIN E. FITCH, INC., EMPLOYER, UNITED…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 2, 1968

Citations

212 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1968)