From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinson v. City of Columbia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 31, 2014
564 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-2292

03-31-2014

STEVEN L. HINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLUMBIA, CITY OF, Defendant - Appellee.

Steven L. Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. William Allen Nickles, III, NICKLES LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-01032-MBS) Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven L. Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. William Allen Nickles, III, NICKLES LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Hinson appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Columbia in his action alleging claims for failure to rehire and failure to accommodate pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinson v. Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-01032-MBS (D.S.C. filed Sept. 24, 2013; entered Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hinson v. City of Columbia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 31, 2014
564 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Hinson v. City of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN L. HINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLUMBIA, CITY OF, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

564 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2014)