From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinrichsen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 1998
711 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-03393

Opinion filed June 10, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.

Bob Dillinger, Public Defender, Clearwater, and Michael A. Tewell, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges a habitual felony offender sentence imposed after his conviction for felony driving while license suspended or revoked. He contends that the habitual felony offender classification is invalid because the trial court initiated the habitualization process by preparing and filing the notice of enhanced penalty required by section 775.084(3)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1995). The State concedes that the habitual felony offender sentence must be reversed pursuant to Young v. State, 699 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1997), wherein the supreme court held that the decision to prosecute a defendant as a habitual offender is a prosecutorial function to be initiated at the prosecutor's discretion and not by the trial court. We therefore reverse the appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

PATTERSON and GREEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hinrichsen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 1998
711 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Hinrichsen v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HINRICHSEN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 10, 1998

Citations

711 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)