From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinman v. Croyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 2008
886 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 2008)

Opinion

Submitted February 4, 2008.

Decided March 20, 2008.

Reported below, 46 AD3d 1167.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that Croyle Enterprises, Inc. must appear by attorney ( see CPLR 321 [a]), and Damian Croyle, who is not an attorney, may not act as its authorized legal representative.


Summaries of

Hinman v. Croyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 2008
886 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 2008)
Case details for

Hinman v. Croyle

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of SCOTT D…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 2008

Citations

886 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 2008)
10 N.Y.3d 800
857 N.Y.S.2d 30