From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 13, 2019
279 So. 3d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2D19-2828

08-13-2019

James HINES, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance in the trial court, such as by filing a motion to hear and rule, before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Contrary to the petitioner's assertion that he filed a "status motion" in the trial court, no such motion appears on that court's docket.

MORRIS, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 13, 2019
279 So. 3d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Hines v. State

Case Details

Full title:James HINES, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 13, 2019

Citations

279 So. 3d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)