From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. Owens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2011
448 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6123

09-30-2011

SHAMAR RASHI HINES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOHN OWENS, Warden; FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondents - Appellees.

Shamar Rashi Hines, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:10-cv-02843-RBH)

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shamar Rashi Hines, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shamar Rashi Hines, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hines v. Owens, No. 4:10-cv-02843-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hines v. Owens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2011
448 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Hines v. Owens

Case Details

Full title:SHAMAR RASHI HINES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOHN OWENS, Warden; FCI…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Citations

448 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Warden, FCI Butner

Darden v. Stephens, 426 F. App'x 173, * 1 -2 (4th Cir. Apr. 29, 2011) (declining to extend § 2255 savings…

Poole v. Johns

The Fourth Circuit, however, has not extended the reach of the savings clause to include actions of…