From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hindle v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 20, 2014
Case No. 14-2437-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 20, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 14-2437-JTM

10-20-2014

DAVID R. HINDLE, Plaintiff, v. ZECK FORD, ET AL., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff David R. Hindle's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Dkt. 3). Plaintiff submitted an affidavit of financial status in support of his motion. The matter was considered by United States Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James (Dkt. 5), who filed a Report and Recommendation on October 1, 2014, suggesting plaintiff's motion be denied. Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation with the court. Rather, plaintiff paid the filing fee on October 6, 2014. The court adopts Judge James's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) in full.

IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2014, that plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is DENIED.

s\J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Hindle v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 20, 2014
Case No. 14-2437-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Hindle v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:DAVID R. HINDLE, Plaintiff, v. ZECK FORD, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Oct 20, 2014

Citations

Case No. 14-2437-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 20, 2014)