From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hindenlang v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 4, 1999
528 U.S. 810 (1999)

Summary

holding no new trial was warranted based on allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in closing arguments, where prosecutor's statements involved fair response to defense evidence; prosecutor did not personally vouch for credibility of witness but rather properly argued witness' testimony supported guilty verdict

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Burno

Opinion

No. 98-1700.

October 4, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 164 F. 3d 1029.


Summaries of

Hindenlang v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 4, 1999
528 U.S. 810 (1999)

holding no new trial was warranted based on allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in closing arguments, where prosecutor's statements involved fair response to defense evidence; prosecutor did not personally vouch for credibility of witness but rather properly argued witness' testimony supported guilty verdict

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Burno
Case details for

Hindenlang v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HINDENLANG v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

528 U.S. 810 (1999)
120 S. Ct. 41

Citing Cases

Stange v. Janssen Pharms., Inc.

Prince George Center, Inc. v. U.S. Gypsum Co. , 704 A.2d 141, 145 (Pa.Super. 1997), appeal denied , 557 Pa.…

Richey v. U.S.

The court ordered the reinstatement to active duty of Richey, because the Army Board for the Correction of…