From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillcrest Silk Mills v. Siquax Silk Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1924
238 N.Y. 613 (N.Y. 1924)

Opinion

Submitted June 2, 1924

Decided June 6, 1924

Lewis R. Conklin for motion.

Isidor E. Schlesinger opposed.


Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on ground appeal is frivolous.


Summaries of

Hillcrest Silk Mills v. Siquax Silk Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1924
238 N.Y. 613 (N.Y. 1924)
Case details for

Hillcrest Silk Mills v. Siquax Silk Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HILLCREST SILK MILLS, Respondent, v . SIQUAX SILK CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 6, 1924

Citations

238 N.Y. 613 (N.Y. 1924)