From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Warden S. Ohio Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
C-1-12-63 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

C-1-12-63

03-21-2013

DAVID TYRONE HILL, Plaintiff v. WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendant


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 24), plaintiff's response (doc. no. 26) and defendant's response thereto (doc. no. 27). The Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff's case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case and agrees with the Judge.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 24). Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution.

This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hill v. Warden S. Ohio Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
C-1-12-63 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hill v. Warden S. Ohio Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:DAVID TYRONE HILL, Plaintiff v. WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

C-1-12-63 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)