Hill v. U.S. Bancorp

Full title: TIFFANY HILL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANCORP, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

2:15-cv-00540-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

TIFFANY HILL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANCORP, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-00540-MCE-EFB United States District Court, E.D. California. October 7, 2015

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         Presently before the Court is a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF No. 11) filed by Andrew W. Graham of the Law Offices of Bowman & Associates ("Counsel"), counsel for Plaintiff Tiffany Hill ("Plaintiff"), by which Counsel seeks to withdraw leaving Plaintiff in propria persona. This Motion is governed by the requirements of Eastern District of California Local Rule 182(d), which provides, among other things, that "[t]he attorney shall provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the motion to withdraw."

         No attorney affidavit has been provided. Accordingly, the Motion as filed is deficient for failure to comply with Local Rule 182(d), and Counsel's request to withdraw (ECF No. 11) is DENIED without prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.