From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Stump

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 28, 2002
77 S.W.3d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Nos. ED 79733 and ED 79907

April 23, 2002 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 28, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Honorable M. Edward Williams.

Don V. Kelly, Thomas W. Wehrle, Gallop, Johnson Neuman, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Floyd T. Norrick, Thurman, Howald, Weber, Senkel Norrick, L.L.C., Hillsboro, MO, for respondents.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J.



ORDER


Both parties appeal from the trial court's judgment reforming a road easement, declaring a road maintenance agreement invalid, and denying a breach of bailment claim.

The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The motion to vacate and remand for failure to join an indispensable party is denied.


Summaries of

Hill v. Stump

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 28, 2002
77 S.W.3d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Hill v. Stump

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT S. HILL, JR., Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and LORETTA F…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 28, 2002

Citations

77 S.W.3d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)