From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 20, 1984
459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-3018.

November 20, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert P. Kaye, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Henry R. Barksdale, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We affirm the defendant's conviction for armed robbery upon a holding that the error in admitting a passing reference to the defendant being identified as the perpetrator of the crime, even if arguably hearsay under Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1981), was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of, among other things, the defendant's complete confession to the crime, the admission of which is not challenged on appeal, and the fact that the reference played no further part in the State's case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 20, 1984
459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARSHELL JOSEPH HILL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 20, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Times v. State

We have not overlooked the defendant's contrary arguments on appeal, but are not persuaded thereby. Pringle…

J.G. v. State

" Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) ( quoting Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851, 854 (Fla. 3d…