From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 9, 2016
No. 05-15-00989-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-15-00989-CR

06-09-2016

ROSICK HILL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-1171579-K

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On May 9, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant's brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Nanette Hendrickson; (3) counsel's explanation for the delay in filing appellant's brief is due to her workload; and (4) counsel anticipates filing a brief within thirty days.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 9, 2016
No. 05-15-00989-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROSICK HILL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 9, 2016

Citations

No. 05-15-00989-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2016)