From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Satra Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1978
65 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

November 28, 1978


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 31, 1978, denying defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds plaintiff is not the real party in interest and has failed to join an indispensable party, unanimously affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal payable to respondent. Special Term acted properly in denying defendants' motion "any form of assignment which purports to assign or transfer a chose in action confers upon the transferee such title or ownership as will enable him to sue upon it. This is true even though the assignment is for the purpose of suit only and the transferee is obligated to account for the proceeds of suit to his assignor." (Titus v Wallick, 306 U.S. 282, 289; see, also, Allen v Brown, 44 N.Y. 228; Meeker v Claghorn, 44 N.Y. 349; Gellens v 11 West 42nd St., 259 App. Div. 435, mot for lv to app den 259 App. Div. 1002.) Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on this issue and we hold, as a matter of law, that he is the proper party plaintiff. Defendants' other contention is devoid of any merit.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.


Summaries of

Hill v. Satra Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1978
65 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Hill v. Satra Corporation

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS W. HILL, JR., Respondent, v. SATRA CORPORATION et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Tawil v. Finkelstein Bruckman

The language of the settlement agreement could not be clearer in its assignment of "all of the Sellers'…

RCR Services Inc. v. Herbil Holding Co.

Further, because the plaintiff, at the time it served the complaint on Herbil in 1994 ( see, Arnold v. Mayal…