From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Salazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-2058 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-2058 MCE CKD P

12-19-2018

RICKY LEWIS HILL, Plaintiff, v. J. SALAZAR, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 8, 2018, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 19, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
hill2058.fta


Summaries of

Hill v. Salazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-2058 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Hill v. Salazar

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LEWIS HILL, Plaintiff, v. J. SALAZAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-2058 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2018)