From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Rowell

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
May 19, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-CV-266-WKW (M.D. Ala. May. 19, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-266-WKW.

May 19, 2009


ORDER


There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 107), and upon an independent review of the file, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is adopted and that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 30, 40, 52, 75), are GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with costs taxed against Plaintiff for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Hill v. Rowell

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
May 19, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-CV-266-WKW (M.D. Ala. May. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Hill v. Rowell

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE LAMAR HILL AIS # 138707, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY WARDEN ROWELL, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-266-WKW (M.D. Ala. May. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Eisenmann v. Delemar's Nevada Gold-Min. Co.

And, inasmuch as the delay has not caused any injury or damage to the plaintiff,-- the question being within…