From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Revells

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2021
No. 21-2110 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-2110

12-17-2021

MICHAEL WAYNE HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS, Defendant-Appellee.

Michael Wayne Hill, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: December 16, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:20-cv-00233-FL)

Michael Wayne Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Michael Wayne Hill appeals the district court's order denying his postjudgment motion for order of regress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Revells, No. 4:20-cv-00233-FL (E.D. N.C. Sept. 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hill v. Revells

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2021
No. 21-2110 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Revells

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WAYNE HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

No. 21-2110 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)

Citing Cases

Sleem v. United States Fed. Gov't

To establish a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must prove: “(1) the violation of a right secured by the…

Patrick v. Boyd

. To establish a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must prove: “(1) the 6 violation of a right secured by the…