Hill v. Rastatter

Full title: ALPHONZO H. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS M. RASTATTER, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Case No. 3:12-cv-173 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-173

03-08-2013

ALPHONZO H. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS M. RASTATTER, et al., Defendants.

WALTER HERBERT RICE

District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #16)

IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC.

#17) OVERRULED; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) (DOC. #15)

Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge, in his Report and Recommendation, filed February 25, 2013 (Doc. #16), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court adopts the aforesaid Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and overrules Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #17) thereto.

Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) (Doc. #15) is denied. The above captioned case shall remain terminated upon the Court's docket.

________________

WALTER HERBERT RICE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT