From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Parkway Sch. Dist.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec 18, 2012
388 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98542.

2012-12-18

Charlie HILL, Employee/Appellant, v. PARKWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Employee/Appellant. Parkway School District, Chesterfield, MO, Pro Se.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Employee/Appellant. Parkway School District, Chesterfield, MO, Pro Se.
Michael Eugene Cook Pritchett, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Charlie Hill appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hill v. Parkway Sch. Dist.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec 18, 2012
388 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Parkway Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Charlie HILL, Employee/Appellant, v. PARKWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

Citations

388 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)