From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Nolan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-648 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-648

12-21-2015

Gregory Hill, Plaintiff v. Arleen Nolan, et al., Defendants


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed October 8, 2015 (Doc. 4).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

This Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Callahan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6 Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3rd 274, 277 (6 Cir. 1997). Date: December 21, 2015

s/Sandra S. Beckwith

Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hill v. Nolan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-648 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Hill v. Nolan

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Hill, Plaintiff v. Arleen Nolan, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-648 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2015)