Opinion
Argued October 2, 1877
Decided October 9, 1877
William H. Arnoux, for appellant.
Charles D. Adams, for rsspondent.
Agree to affirm opinion of court below.
All concur, except FOLGER and MILLER, JJ., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued October 2, 1877
Decided October 9, 1877
William H. Arnoux, for appellant.
Charles D. Adams, for rsspondent.
Agree to affirm opinion of court below.
All concur, except FOLGER and MILLER, JJ., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:CHARLES E. HILL, Respondent, v . THE NEWICHAWANICK COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 9, 1877
It was held the defendant was not entitled to the dividend although by the rules of the New York Stock…
Matter of Ringler Co.Under the well-settled law of this State the moment that Strauss, Kugelman and Trommer acquired the legal…