Summary
holding "even if the ALJ technically erred in failing to address each regulatory factors, any error was harmless inasmuch as the Plaintiff has not shown a reasonable probability that an explicit analysis would have resulted in a [different] finding."
Summary of this case from Prince v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
No. 5:12CV-00072-R
06-27-2013
STEPHANIE M. HILL Plaintiff v. MICHAEL ASTRUE Commissioner of Social Security Defendant
ORDER
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report in light of the objections thereto (DN 13), the Commissioner's response (DN 14), and the record as a whole. The Magistrate Judge's Report is hereby ADOPTED, and its findings and conclusions are incorporated by reference herein. It is therefore ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and that the Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.
This is a final and appealable Order, and there is no just cause for delay. Date: June 27, 2013 CC: Counsel
/s/
Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge
United States District Court