From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 12, 2011
1 N.E.3d 663 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011)

Summary

holding legal services contracts or retainer agreements are not per se protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege

Summary of this case from Huntington Chase Condo. Ass'n v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.

Opinion

NO. 1-10-1588

2011-05-12

Hill v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.


Trial Court County: Cook

Disposition: Aff'd in pt., vac. in pt.


Summaries of

Hill v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 12, 2011
1 N.E.3d 663 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011)

holding legal services contracts or retainer agreements are not per se protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege

Summary of this case from Huntington Chase Condo. Ass'n v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.
Case details for

Hill v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Hill v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: May 12, 2011

Citations

1 N.E.3d 663 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011)
376 Ill. Dec. 951
408 Ill. App. 3d 1123

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.

As relevant here, payment of fees and information regarding fees are generally not privileged. See People ex…

Huntington Chase Condo. Ass'n v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.

Stopka v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., Inc., 816 F.Supp.2d 516, 532-533 (N.D. Ill. 2011). See also Hill v.…