From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Mann

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 18, 2024
24-cv-02578-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02578-YGR (PR)

06-18-2024

CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DR. MANN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

JUDGE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On April 30, 2024, plaintiff, a civil detainee, filed the present pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On that same date the Clerk of the Court sent a notice to plaintiff, informing him that his action could not go forward until he paid the filing fee or filed a completed non-prisoner's in forma pauperis application. The Clerk sent plaintiff a blank non-prisoner in forma pauperis application and told him that he must pay the fee or return the completed application within twenty-eight days or his action would be dismissed. More than twenty-eight days have passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, returned the non-prisoner in forma pauperis application, or otherwise communicated with the Court.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Mann

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 18, 2024
24-cv-02578-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Hill v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DR. MANN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 18, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02578-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2024)