From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lewis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 30, 2015
CV 11-3119-JLS (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015)

Opinion

          Demarcus R A Hill, Petitioner, Pro se, Imperial, CA.

          For Gary Lewis, Respondent: Kevin R Vienna, LEAD ATTORNEY, CAAG Office of Attorney General of California, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lewis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 30, 2015
CV 11-3119-JLS (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Hill v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:DEMARCUS R.A. HILL, Petitioner, v. GARY LEWIS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 30, 2015

Citations

CV 11-3119-JLS (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015)