From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lane

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 30, 2023
4:22-cv-00403-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-cv-00403-KGB-JTK

01-30-2023

PATRICIA HILL, ADC #716846 PLAINTIFF v. LANE DEFENDANT


ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 3). No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 3).

It is therefore ordered that:

1. The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff Patricia Hill's complaint for failure to prosecute (Dkt. No. 1).
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lane

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 30, 2023
4:22-cv-00403-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Hill v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA HILL, ADC #716846 PLAINTIFF v. LANE DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

4:22-cv-00403-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2023)