From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Desmarais

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 20, 2010
Case No. 2:09-CV-1109 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-1109.

July 20, 2010


ORDER


On June 28, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants DesMarais, Houts, Prall and Ault be dismissed with prejudice and that the claim against Defendant Mues be dismissed without prejudice. Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 66. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so, id.,. at 13 — 14, there has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 66, is therefore ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's motions reflected in Doc. Nos. 12, 18, 19, 20, 32, 33, 45 are DENIED; and Defendants' motions reflected in Doc. Nos. 9, 24 are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Dr. DesMarais, Dr. Houts, Dr. Prall and Ms. Ault are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the claim against Defendant Dr. Mues is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this case.


Summaries of

Hill v. Desmarais

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 20, 2010
Case No. 2:09-CV-1109 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Hill v. Desmarais

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HILL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DESMARAIS, M.D., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-1109 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)