Opinion
Civil Action 6:19-cv-22
06-10-2022
RICHARD J. HILL, Plaintiff, v. SGT. FREDDIE DAVIS, et al., . Defendants.
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL CHIEF JUDGE
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, doc. 70. Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. In fact, the Court's mailing was returned as undeliverable, with the notations: “Return to Sender, Unable to Forward.” Doc. 71 at 1.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, GRANTS Defendants Adams, Brownlee, Davis, Deal, Jackson, Shemaury, Mikell, Powell, and Williams' construed Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Further, the Court DENIES as moot Defendant Sistrunk's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Adopt Other Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Cain's Motion for Summary Judgment. Docs. 55. 60, 69.
SO ORDERED.