From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. City of Warren

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 9, 2005
474 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2005)

Opinion

No. 128511.

November 9, 2005.


Summary Dispositions.

SC: 128511, COA: 259706.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Among the issues to be considered, the Court of Appeals shall consider whether Pohutski v. City of Allen Park, 465 Mich 675 (2002), affects the class certification issue in this case. Pohutski held that § 7 of the governmental tort liability act, MCL 691.1407, does not permit a trespass-nuisance exception to governmental immunity, but ruled that this holding would be applied only to cases brought on or after April 2, 2002. In light of Pohutski, are issues relating to putative plaintiffs unnamed as of April 2, 2002, sufficiently disparate from issues relating to plaintiffs who were named as of April 2, 2002, to the extent that certification of a single class containing both groups of plaintiffs would be inappropriate under MCR 3.501(A)(1)? We do not retain jurisdiction.

KELLY, J. I would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Hill v. City of Warren

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 9, 2005
474 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2005)
Case details for

Hill v. City of Warren

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HILL, SHIRLEY HILL, TIMOTHY CARLSON, RANDALL KOLODZIEJSKI, LINDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 9, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2005)
705 N.W.2d 345

Citing Cases

Hill v. City of Warren

On remand, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court in a published opinion. Hill v. City of Warren,…