Hill v. City of Los Angeles

Full title: JIMMY HILL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 21, 2009

CV 08-7689-MMM (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2009)

Opinion

JIMMY HILL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants. No. CV 08-7689-MMM (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 21, 2009

          ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED; and (2) defendants shall file an Answer to the Complaint within twenty (20) days of this Order.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of the Order on plaintiff and on counsel for defendants.