From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HILL v. BURL

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Nov 22, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-00120-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-00120-SWW-JJV.

November 22, 2011.


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Holloway's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 115) is GRANTED.

2. ADC Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 117) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

4. Mr. Holloway's request that this dismissal be counted as a "strike" is DENIED.

5. All pending motions are rendered MOOT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HILL v. BURL

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Nov 22, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-00120-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

HILL v. BURL

Case Details

Full title:HILL v. BURL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-00120-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2011)