From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hiles v. Inoveris, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 29, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-53 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-53.

April 29, 2010


ORDER


As no objections have been filed, the Court hereby ADOPTS the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 50), and hereby ORDERS that:

A. The Joint Motion is hereby GRANTED.
B. The Settlement Agreement is found to be fair, reasonable, and equitable and is hereby APPROVED in all respects.
C. A class is hereby CERTIFIED, for settlement purposes only, comprised of all persons who worked at or reported to Defendant Inoveris' Dublin, Ohio facility and were terminated without cause on or about December 6, 2008 through April 3, 2009, and who are affected employees, within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 2101(a)(5), who did not file a timely request to opt-out of the class, and who have not otherwise released their claims. Members of the Settlement Class are identified on Exhibit 1 of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
D. The law firms of Lankenau Miller LLP and The Gardner Firm, P.C. are hereby APPOINTED, for settlement purposes only, as counsel for the Class.
E. This Court hereby retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hiles v. Inoveris, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 29, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-53 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Hiles v. Inoveris, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTY HILES, et al. Plaintiffs, v. INOVERIS, LLC, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 29, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-53 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2010)